Clark County, Washington · 2026 values

How fair are the county's values?

Two tests, both from the sales the assessor itself used: do county values track sale prices, and do they track them equally for cheap and expensive homes and across neighborhoods. The standards are the International Association of Assessing Officers' ratio-study standards, the ones the state applies.

Homes compared
156,061
332 neighborhoods · median value $510,530
County value ÷ sale price
95%
median of 5,638 sales · target 90% to 110%
Spread (COD)
7.9
within the standard of 15 for houses
Price-related differential
1.014
within 0.98 to 1.03; above 1.03 means expensive homes are valued lower
Price-related bias
0.010
within −0.05 to 0.05; negative means values fall behind as prices rise

Cheaper homes versus expensive homes

Median by sale-price tier (fifths of this year's sales). Equal bars mean the county values a $400,000 home and a $900,000 home at the same share of what they sell for. Bars that fall from left to right mean cheaper homes carry a higher share of value, which is the pattern found in many counties nationally.

80%90%100%110%95%under $424,0001126 sales95%$424,000+1119 sales95%$499,900+1125 sales95%$590,000+1140 sales93%over $774,9601128 sales

Uniformity by neighborhood

Darker means a wider among the sales in that neighborhood; the standard is 15 or less for similar houses, 20 for varied areas. Only neighborhoods with 20 or more sales are shown. Hover for the numbers; click to open the neighborhood.

Circle size: number of homes. Darker: wider spread of sales ratios.

Where values grew fastest and slowest

Typical yearly growth of county values over the last five years, by neighborhood (homes with a stable history only).

Darker: faster five-year growth. Click a circle to open the neighborhood.

Fastest, five years

4Woodland+8.5%/yr841
20Camas+8.5%/yr1,425
159Camas+7.8%/yr278
715Camas+7.6%/yr122
15Ridgefield+7.6%/yr907
19Washougal+7.6%/yr964

Slowest, five years

297Vancouver−14.4%/yr106
376Vancouver−10.7%/yr45
375Vancouver−8.8%/yr62
384Vancouver−8.7%/yr41
373Vancouver−5.6%/yr50
301Vancouver−5.5%/yr106

Who carries the levy

Share of the county's taxable value by city, 2008 and 2026. Under budget-based levies, a city whose share grows takes on more of each countywide district's budget. New construction counts.

City20082026Value growth
Vancouver60.2%59.7%147%
Camas8.6%9.7%181%
Battle Ground7.6%7.9%159%
Ridgefield4.9%7.6%288%
Washougal4.7%4.5%137%
Unincorporated7.2%4.0%38%
Brush Prairie2.6%2.4%134%
LA Center1.9%2.1%174%
Yacolt1.1%1.1%133%
Woodland0.6%0.6%132%
Amboy0.6%0.5%121%

Widest spread of ratios

11Battle Ground58.4762
15Ridgefield36.1907
3LA Center32.71,649
13Battle Ground29.0804
12Brush Prairie24.5883
6Battle Ground22.8857

Tightest spread of ratios

231Vancouver2.7824
263Vancouver2.81,218
264Vancouver2.8885
243Vancouver2.91,790
244Vancouver2.91,657
261Vancouver3.11,275

By kind of home

condos
$302,183
6,183 homes · median county value
manufactured homes
$72,553
8,478 homes · median county value
houses
$537,278
133,563 homes · median county value
townhomes
$396,582
7,837 homes · median county value

5.9% of homes use the senior and disabled exemption. Ratios by neighborhood income will appear here once Census data is connected. Built from the assessor's 2026 values and the sales it used to set them. How this works